to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:28 PM
subject Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon’ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182
mailed-by gmail.com
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. December 10, 2008
Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182
Your Honour,
I have been constrained to conclude for the following reasons, that the Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao is conducting this hearing for the admission of my mandamus writ petition, in a frivolous and vexatious manner and with a transparent intention to trivialise, humiliate and defeat me and minimise the onus of the all powerful respondents:
1. Despite repeated requests and mention that I have had to struggle with the Andhra Pradesh High Court Legal Services Committee since a year, the Hon'ble Judge has not made any visible effort to provide me with sound legal counsel. This lapse, in a case as serious as this, is similar to the intriguing insanity of repeatedly sending ill equipped persons into harm's way.
2. The Hon'ble Judge has not taken any notice of the contempt that till date, the State Information Commission has not issued a counter. The SIC's counsel has not even appeared in court.
3. The Hon'ble Judge has gratuitously and reflexively taken every opportunity to jeer and ridicule me in my deprived and defenseless state while remaining mute on the grave infractions committed by the all powerful respondents and by others.
4. After my presentation of the decisive evidence ordered by the Hon'ble Judge, he has granted the respondents an untimely, abrupt and lavish adjournment and since then appears to have lost his initial enthusiasm to conduct the hearing.
Your Honour, I plead with you to kindly help me with a legal counsel, with the necessary intellectual, psychological and professional maturity, to productively partner me in the successful conduct of this important case.
I request you to kindly ensure that the relevant affidavits are meticulously mastered and cases are heard properly by an unimpeachable legal authority, without any dilatoriness, obfuscation or other appearance of bias.
I also request you to take any other actions that you may think fit to compensate me for the delays I have suffered and to restore my confidence in the judicial conduct of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
Sincerely, I am
Divakar S Natarajan
Attachments:
1. Detailed account of "Serious apprehensions..." 2. "Compelling Criminality" – a bare account of Divakar's individual sathyagraha against corruption
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon’ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad November 23, 2008
Re:
STATUS OF: WP 20182 of 2008
STAGE: ADMISSION (GAD) DIVAKAR S. NATARAJAN, HYD V/S STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, HYD & 2 OTHERS
Pet.Advocate: PARTY-IN-PERSON
Res.Advocate: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
SR-Number: / District: HYDERABAD Lower Court Number: Subject: GENERAL ADMINISTRTION DEPT. (MISC.MATTERS)
Last Time Listed On: 21-Nov-2008
Next Date Of Listing: 05-Dec-2008 Misc. Petitions filed: WPMP 26356/2008 Connected Matters:na
Sub: Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Conduct Of WP 20182 of 2008
Your Honour,
On February 20, 2008 I had appealed for the services of the Andhra Pradesh High Court Legal Services Committee through an exhaustively documented and comprehensively descriptive application.
My application documented serious illegalities and maladministration by the State Information Commissioner and the Chief Secretary, Government Of Andhra Pradesh.
It appears that after approximately one month of my application, on 12 March 2008, the Committee sought independent legal opinion from its counsel on the matter. Approximately forty days later, on 25 April, 2008, the advocate advanced his opinions in favour.
Following the receipt of the favourable legal opinion, the Committee then commenced its search for a counsel to represent me.
According to the Secretary, the search was conducted among fledgling lawyers who were looking to augment their nascent practices by performing routine legal chores for the Committee.
They were all shown my papers and one after another they all refused. The Secretary then proceeded to inform me that the Chairman had asked him to inform me that he believed that the Committee had done its best for me and it could do no further.
When I requested him to kindly fix an appointment for me to appeal to the Chairman, he informed me that the Chairman did not wish to meet me or hear my appeal.
Memorably he said, “You cannot argue with a judge”.
I did not give up and immediately called the Hon’ble Judge’s chamber to seek an appointment. I was lucky and the Hon’ble Judge himself picked up the phone and kindly gave me an appointment that very afternoon. He heard me patiently, enquired from me as to why I could not appear as party in person, and when I demurred that I had no knowledge either of all the legal ramifications of my situation nor any experience of judicial procedure or my rights in a court room, he instructed the Secretary to file the papers and recommence the search.
It was decided that the same lawyer who had offered his opinion would be requested to prepare the papers. The papers were prepared by July.
After several false starts– queried and returned by Registry for being filed as a CLP, necessitating another meeting with the Chairman – missing documents – incomplete index etc – the Secretary had entrusted the job to the junior most clerk - they were finally filed on 22nd August 2008.
I have repeatedly informed the hon’ble judges that all the relevant papers may not have been filed.
However, no legal counsel had been appointed yet. This lapse, in a case as serious as this one, is similar to the intriguing insanity of repeatedly sending ill equipped persons into harm’s way.
The case was posted before the Hon’ble Justice N V Ramana and the Secretary whispered into the ears of the hon’ble judge and sought two adjournments.
When the Committee appeared to have finally found a lawyer, she unfortunately took strong exception to my unwillingness to blindly sign the vakalatnama without meeting her.
Memorably she said,” You cannot ask any questions if you come to Legal Services. If you want to ask questions, engage your own lawyer. “
Now the hon’ble judge kindly summoned a senior advocate to his chamber - I was not present - and later instructed me to meet him.
I spent two hours to pick up the papers from the Committee and met him punctually at his residence at the appointed minute.
This lawyer, had not properly informed himself of the facts of my case, but attempted to interrogate me about what my intentions were with my litigation.
This was curious considering that he had not made any assurance that he was accepting my case.
This man finally informed me that he was appearing in a major case the following day and instructed me to present myself before the hon’ble judge and request yet another adjournment.
I had to travel all the way from Begumpet to the High Court just to perform a menial chore and ask for yet another adjournment.
Two days later, when I called this lawyer, he instructed me to ask for another fortnight’s adjournment. When I started to demur, he flatly informed me that he would not accept my case. He did not give me any reasons.
In the meanwhile, the hon’ble judge had perused my affidavits and had issued a fortnight’s notice to the respondents.
When I appeared at his court a fortnight later, the respondents had not prepared their counter.
The hon’ble judge expressed his displeasure, warned that he may have to personally summon the respondents to the court, and gave them another ten days.
When I appeared ten days later, I had to do a lot of running around before I finally discovered that the hon’ble judge VVS Rao would now hear the case.
Hon’ble Judge Shri VVS Rao hears the case:
During the very first hearing, I was perplexed by the hon’ble judge’s apparent lack of preparedness and his unfortunate reflex of making cruel remarks .
The Hon’ble Judge opened by asking me to introduce myself. “Mass communicator? What is that?” I then proceeded to talk about my documentary and gave a sketchy account of what I call my sathyagraha.
Given that my affidavit contained a reasonable account of my work and ordeal, I had to wonder whether the hon’ble judge had chosen to make a spectacle and had sought to belittle me in some fashion.
Later I informed the hon’ble judge that I was severely handicapped because I had not received my constitutional right for competent, independent legal
counsel. “But why cannot you represent yourself?” enquired the Hon’ble judge, “You appear to present yourself quite well.”
I respectfully informed the hon’ble judge, that it was not just a simple matter of presenting myself before a judge.
I informed him that till date I did not have any competent independent legal opinion of the issues and opportunities in my case.
Even as a layman, I was not satisfied with the papers that were filed. I did not know what my courtroom rights were.
“I am aware of my limitations,” I informed the hon’ble judge, “This is a serious litigation and I feel myself to be severely handicapped by a lack of proper counsel and representation.”
“I like to think of myself as an ethical person, but I am not familiar with the processes of the judicial system.”
To my disappointment, the hon’ble judge responded with a comment that was as alarming for its pedestrian, uninsightful nature as it was for its cruel and disparaging spirit.
“Oh!” exclaimed the judge,”Ethical! But no money!”
This was nothing short of a gratuitous verbal slap on my face, but I retained my composure and open mindedness to be able to respond, “True Sir, but my devotion to ethics seems to be perversely validated by the global financial tsunami.”
The hon’ble judge did not respond.
There have been three hearings held on consecutive days since, but during every hearing I have had to raise my voice and counter the hon’ble judge, “Your honour. With due respect you do not appear to be familiar with my affidavits and papers. You appear to be confused.”
My serious request for counsel had been brushed aside.
The respondents’ lawyers were never questioned and during this continuing one sided spectacle, the hon’ble judge was observably too preoccupied with his inquisition to offer me even the plain courtesy of a podium to place my papers.
It was only on the third day, the penultimate day of this four day chunk that the hon’ble judge permitted himself to reveal some grasp of my affidavits.
Given that the nub of the Chief Secretary’s counter is the prima facie absurd assertion that there are no documents to support my claim that the former Chief Minister had made repeated representations to the Former Information & Broadcasting Ministers on my behalf, and my assertion that copies were physically presented to the former CS, presented again in the form of a completely documented CD and also emailed by me to the former Chief Secretary and that these documents appeared to have been wantonly destroyed or lost to justify the administration’s negligence – the hon’ble judge now asked me whether I could produce copies of the emails that I had claimed to have sent to the former Chief Secretary.
I affirmed that I could and informed the hon’ble court that I had indeed forwarded them to the Secretary, Legal Services, the hon’ble judge directed me to produce them in court on the following day.
On the following day I forwarded the same to the hon’ble judge’s email address and informed his office accordingly. The hon’ble judge’s personal secretary then informed me that the hon’ble judge had kindly advised me to present them in a sealed envelope to the Registrar’s office to be forwarded to the court.
I briefed the Secretary, Legal services accordingly but noticed that all that the Secretary had done was put a single copy in a plain envelope, staple it and present the same through his attender to the hon’ble judge’s clerk in the court.
While I was horrified by this willful abuse of procedure and the hon’ble judge grimaced as he received the envelope I noticed that he did not utter a single,reprimanding word.
He scrutinized it and passed it on to the opposing counsel and asked them to make copies for themselves and also present a copy to me.
It does not appear as if this crucial evidence has yet been registered.
Then to my complete surprise, the hon’ble judge chose to adjourn the matter for another fifteen days. He did not ask whether I had any objections.
I believe the hon’ble judge’s adjournment was untimely, abrupt and amounted to a lavish gift to the all powerful respondents at my cost.
The hon’ble judge’s 15 day adjournment was untimely because my emails- including copies of the former CM’s letters, knocked the base out of the respondents’ flimsy assertions.
It categorically proved the falsity of their affidavits and demonstrated that I had done everything I humanly could and that they had abused an already stretched judicial process by willfully provoking my litigation.
To offer them a long adjournment at this point was untimely.
The hon’ble judge’s 15 day adjournment was abrupt. Why a sudden 15 day adjournment after having continuously heard the case for four days?
The hon’ble judge’s 15 day adjournment amounted to a lavish gift to the all powerful respondents at my cost.
If the hon’ble judge had asked me I would have brought to his attention the fact that the respondents had been given ample time to present their counter. The previous judge hearing the case had first given them a fortnight’s notice and then a further ten days.
There can be no question that the hon’ble judge’s 15 day adjournment had the unfortunate appearance of largesse to the all powerful respondents at my cost.
Finally, I have noted with concern, that the case against the State Information Commissioner has till date not been countered by their counsel. Indeed it does not appear that their counsel has even made an appearance in the court.
The hon’ble judge has not yet indicated that he has noticed this casual and contemptuous behaviour of the State Information Commissioner.
Your Honour, for the above reasons I have been constrained to conclude that the Hon’ble judge Shri VVS Rao has conducted this hearing both in substance and style in a frivolous, vexatious manner with a transparent intention to trivialize and humiliate me and favour the all powerful respondents.
The continued dysfunctionality of the Andhra Pradesh High Court Legal Services Committee in my case, since almost a year, and its manifest philosophical confusion and organizational decrepitude analogous to reported situations in which ordinary police stations refuse to record First Information Reports, also begs the serious question whether there exists in the Andhra Pradesh High Court a crushing bias in favour of the rich and powerful that is subsidised by the ordinary embattled citizen.
Your Honour, I plead with you to kindly help me with a legal counsel, with the necessary intellectual, psychological and professional maturity, to productively partner me in the successful conduct of this important case.
I request you to kindly ensure that the relevant affidavits are meticulously mastered and cases are heard properly by an unimpeachable legal authority, without any dilatoriness or any other appearance of bias.
I also request you to take any other actions, that you may think fit to compensate me for the delays I have suffered and to restore my confidence in the judicial conduct of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.
Sincerely, I am
Divakar S Natarajan
Excuse Me, Your Honour ?!?
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:12 AM
subject Re:Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon’ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008
mailed-by gmail.com
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. December 18, 2008
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10,2008
Your Honour,
Responding to my telephonic inquiry, your personal secretary kindly informed me yesterday that Your Honour had kindly perused my email to Your Honour and attachments on the above subject and had decided not to take any action.
I shall be deeply grateful if you would kindly confirm to me whether I have heard and understood your response correctly.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
A Pernicious Rebellion Against The Law Of The Land
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:52 AM
subject Re:Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon’ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008
mailed-by gmail.com
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. December 31, 2008
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10,2008 & December 18,2008
Your Honor,
May I request your kind attention towards the clear and unequivocal statements of the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India, reported in the press yesterday
These views endorse,without any shadow of doubt, my assesment of the conduct of the hearing of my writ petition 20182 , in the court of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao, as a vitiated spectacle and waste of valuable time.
They reiterate and underscore the reasonableness of my requests made to your kind self.
Given my experiences with APHCLC that I have described to you, the Chief Justice's views indicate that your Hon'ble Court may have been in pernicious rebellion of the law of the land.
A statement of bitter truth.
But it is certainly one that I have laboured mightily over one year to avoid.
Your honour,judicial time is paid for, but mine is not.
My elderly mother, my daughter and myself have been have been humiliated and tortured since two decades, not for any damage that we have inflicted on society, but because of our steadfast refusal to do so.
Your silence does not give us any relief.
I feel now that I have no option but to pray that whatever Muse of Justice there is will kiss your brows with inspiration and enlighten you to seek truth from the facts, carefully consider cause and effect and do justice without fear, favour or ill will and most of all, with speed.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
Judicial Game Of "Pass The Parcel" ?
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:23 PM
subject Judicial Game of "Pass the Parcel" ?
mailed-by gmail.com
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. January 15, 2009
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008 , December 18, 2008 and December 31,2008.
Your Honour,
It appears that Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narayana Reddy will now hear my nearly year old petition for a mandamus writ.My petition appears as No.105/- in his list, which going by my earlier experience would take close to another ten days to come up.
While this probably represents an improvement over the earlier shocking "file and forget" response, I am unable to read it as anything more than a frail and reluctant admission of delinquency by the Hon'ble Court.
I have to most respectfully submit to Your Honour, that I am not satisfied that the AP High Court has adequately felt the depth and volume of the cynical and unrelenting breach of trust and torture, that it has perpetrated on me over the period of nearly one year through its
slovenly judicial conduct in a matter that has passed prima facie muster of allegations of serious illegality in two of the most powerful offices in the state.
The AP High Court's action to change the Judge hearing my nearly year old petition for a writ,coming as it does baldly and without any explanation,contains no expression of commiseration, compassion, empathy or remorse, no assurance that the previously enacted sordid drama will not be visited on me again and leaves the matter of relief entirely to my currently overburdened imagination.
In the circumstances, the mere act of changing the judge is too nuanced a gesture to be interpreted as anything other than a continuation of spectacle.
The Hon'ble court may want to consider drawing a thicker line that distinguishes self serving gesture from an act of ripe justice.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
Thank God For Kasab! Thank God For The Satyam Fiasco !
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:43 PM
subject Thank God For Kasab! Thank God For The Satyam Fiasco!
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details Jan 18
Reply
Follow up message
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. January 18, 2009
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008 , December 18, 2008 and December 31,2008 & Judicial Game of "Pass the Parcel" ? of January 15,2009.
You Honour,
May I request your kind attention to the article by Nirmalya Kumar,Co-Director, Aditya Birla India Centre at London Business School,titled "Satyam: Not Yet India's Enron". Times of India January 18,2009.
In this article, Prof Kumar makes the point that unless the Indian system demonstrates the nous to deal with this crisis with the 4Cs,namely, Candour (accepting failure) Contrition (accepting responsibility) Compassion (showing concern for those adversely affected) and Commitment (to solving the crisis), it runs the risk of damaging its credibility as a place where grown ups can make investments and do business.
You may recall that this was more or less verbatim, my prayer to you in my email of January 15,2009.
I once again request you to answer my solemn prayers with the 4 Cs.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
The Mafia Does Quietus
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM
subject The Mafia Does Quietus.
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. February 2, 2009
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008 , December 18, 2008 and December 31,2008 , Judicial Game of "Pass the Parcel" ? of January 15,2009 & "Thank God For Kasab. Thank God For The Satyam Fiasco"
Your Honour,
Unfortunately my apprehensions that your kind but mild intervention of changing the Judge would not significantly change the year long partisan, authoritarian and degrading character of the court towards my plea appear to have come true.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court continues to behave like a submissive crony of the Chief Secretary, APGOV and the State Information Commissioner.
* If the Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh is unable to enlist the services of a single professionally mature advocate who will partner me, why does the court not come clean in the public interest and say so?
* Once again the court took no notice, when I pointed out that the counsel for the State Information Commissioner had not bothered to, till date, make an appearance in the court or even issue a counter.
* With the submission by the GP for GAD of a material paper containing letter no 44130/I&PR-11/A2/2008-1 dtd 4 December 2008 from Pri Secy to Govt (GAD) to Secy, I&B Govt of India enclosing,
" 1. GMail from Divakar S Natarajan dated 29-07-05 and 20-11-08.
2.Letter from former Chief MInister of AP dated 17.05.1998 17-07-1999 and 03.06.1997.
3.Letter from Member of Parliament(Lok Sabha), Ex Home Minister (not named but Shri Indrajit Gupta) dated 18.12.1999.
4. Letter from Leader of Opposition, Rajya Sabha, New Delhi (not named but Jaipal Reddy) dated 03.06.92."
the GAD's counter has collapsed.
It is evident that the GP for GAD 's counter is false and misleading in its entirety and exposes the reckless and perverse defamation that I and my family were made to suffer all these years because of administrative negligence and inhuman denial at the highest level.
The GP for GAD's counter clearly constitutes a callous abuse of the judicial process.
However, the Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narasimha Reddy hearing my case has not given any sign that he has noticed this collapse and has judged its implications.
Like the famous leg spinner Shri BS Chandrasekhar is reported to have asked of the cagey Kiwi umpire, I too have to ask, "I know he is bowled. But is he out?"
* In my affidavit, I had stated," The government files provided by the Deputy Secretary/PIO GAD, make obvious the following points:
a. The Chief Secretary APGOV has taken a personal interest and has personally directed the disposal of my file.
b. That at every stage, all significant information has been withheld and false and misleading information has been provided.
However, the Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narasimha Reddy hearing my case has, in a clear attempt to mitigate the onus of the all powerful respondent, not made any mention of this nor enquired about the basis or evidence for my claim.
The "government files" that I mention were part of my application to the APHCLSA. Despite my incessant urging, the Secy/ Aphclsc refused to include these papers to support my affidavit.
* The Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narasimha Reddy has indicated via the sneak peek that he gave of his impending judgement, that he intends to endorse the State Information Commission' s fabrications and the most extreme illegality, namely that of administering a public institution like a private estate.
In order to achieve his dubious purpose of subverting the very idea of rule of law and the judicial process as a check and balance on a delinquent administration, he has indicated, that he intends to rubber stamp, the State Information Commissioner's assault on, of all things, my facility with the English language.
A wise and independent judge, in full possession of his faculties, who cares about the continued health and effectiveness of the RTI Act 2005, may have viewed my refusal to be cowed down by the corrupt SIC's repeated intimidation as an unusual -especially given the multiple collapse of so called "independent" professionals in the horrific Satyam fiasco - act of doughty public responsibility.
But this hon'ble judge has indicated that like an adolescent ( authoritarian, sado masochistic) class monitor, willing at all costs to keep the affection of his master, he intends to admonish me for my alleged "excessive rights consciousness".
This is preposterous, considering that independent, informed and patriotic Indian citizens might consider that currently the most egregious example of "excessive rights consciousness" is emanating from the highest court of our land in its infantile (narcissistic) squall to privilege itself from the reach of the RTI Act 2005.
* The Hon'ble Judge's confession of doubts:
Just before concluding his preview of his judgement, the Hon'ble Judge confessed that he did not consider himself perfect and that I could always appeal his judgement.
In the earlier session, I had to request the Hon'ble Judge Reddy to kindly desist from using self disparaging statements as a device to escape responsibility and to covertly shift blame on the the receiving party. A kind of double entendre.
In view of the facts and opinions that I have already listed, it would be appropriate to read the Hon'ble Judge's 'generous' advice as an irresponsible confession of his doubts , confusion and unconscious guilt regarding his impending judgement.
* A mad curial chorus for "quietus"
In the court of the Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao, I heard the GP for GAD request the Hon'ble Judge, " Judge Saab ab isko khatham kar do" " My Lord, now you must put a quietus to this"
His wish was immediately granted." Hahn, my isko abhi khatham kar doonga." "Yes.Yes. I shall put a quietus to this."
That is when I screamed. "This man is lying, Your Honour. The GAD's affidavit is a pack of lies."
The sheer viscerality of my scream must have gotten to the Hon'ble Judge. That is when he asked me whether I could present copies of the former CM's correspondence. This correspondence has demolished the key stone of the GAD's affidavit which has collapsed.
The Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narasimha Reddy surprised me when he said in conclusion, that he had now put a quietus to the matter.
A vibrant judge may be expected to display and demonstrate, "a passion for independence, a passion for justice, a passion to serve the unfolding of life" - Erich Fromm. Anatomy of Human Destructiveness."
To be subject to this open clamour for putting a quietus on me is quiet unpleasant.
Judges do Justice. Hoodlums do quietus.
Your Honour. I request you to kindly request the Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narasimha Reddy to keep his judgement of my WP 20182/08 in abeyance, while you consider a suitable recourse that will serve the ends of justice, keeping in my mind that my resources and confidence are quite close to breaking point.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
An Absurdly Prejudiced And Dishonest Judgement
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:57 PM
subject Honour My Constitutional Right For Timely And Effective Legal Counsel And Aid.
mailed-by gmail.com
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. February 5, 2009
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008 , December 18, 2008 and December 31,2008 , Judicial Game of "Pass the Parcel" ? of January 15,2009, "Thank God For Kasab. Thank God For The Satyam Fiasco" & " The Mafia Does Quietus" of February 2, 2009
Your Honour,
As feared, the Hon'ble Judge Shri L Narasimha Reddy has dismissed my WP 20182/08.
Given my earlier unhappy experience with the APHCLSA, I have no alternative but to demand your aegis to receive my constitutional right for timely and effective legal counsel and aid, in order that I may consider and pursue my legal options.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
Has The Message From Chennai been heard In Hyderabad ?
from divakar snatarajan
to cjap@ap.nic.in
date Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:25 PM
subject Has The Message From Chennai Been Heard In Hyderabad ?
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details Feb 23
Reply
Follow up message
The Chief Justice of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh,
Hon'ble Shri Anil Ramesh Dave,
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Hyderabad. February 5, 2009
Sub: Further to Serious Apprehensions Regarding The Judicial Conduct Of Hon'ble Judge Shri VVS Rao in WP 20182 dtd December 10, 2008 , December 18, 2008 and December 31,2008 , Judicial Game of "Pass the Parcel" ? of January 15,2009, "Thank God For Kasab. Thank God For The Satyam Fiasco" & " The Mafia Does Quietus" of February 2, 2009 & Honour My Constitutional Right For Timely And Effective Legal Counsel And Aid or February 5,2009
Your Honour,
Responding to advice from your office, I presented myself before your PS the week before last, to follow up on my request to your kind self .
When I called last week, Mr Sridhar Rao, communicated to me that the feeling was that the APHC could not cooperate with me, because I was "digging into" the judges.
Given that there has been no positive response from your end, I have to assume that your office is with deliberate ambiguity, conveying that it has no qualms about abusing its considerable powers to collude in the cover up of serious illegality in high places and to hound a patriotic sathyagrahi into submission to its ignorant, ill conceived, ragging.
Fortunately the events at the Chennai High Court have come at the right time to demonstrate exactly how our courts revel in being a law unto themselves and in holding innocent people hostages to their diseased vanities.
As a loving and constructive Indian who has sacrificed two of the best decades of his life for the cause of an law abiding society, I am in no mood to humour your vanity.
I hope that the pre Talibanic style events would have sobered sections of the legal community who would at least now see my sathyagraha against Indian idiocy in its proper perspective.
I look forward to an intelligent response from you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Divakar S Natarajan
